お問い合わせ
In order to avoid disputes as to whether there is sufficient consideration to support the validity of the agreement, employers should require that the agreement be signed before the employment relationship begins and the agreement should state that the company would not employ the person without the employee`s performance of the agreement. In the event that the agreement was not concluded at the same time as the start of employment, the employer must provide sufficient additional consideration to support the agreement. This consideration may include, for example, a promotion, a one-time bonus or, for example, the grant of limited stock options. In the event of a conclusion after the establishment of the employment relationship, the consideration must be greater than a nominal amount in order to support the agreement. It is unlikely that a dollar will be a sufficient counterpart. It should be noted that even if an employer is satisfied that it may fall within the two exceptions listed above or that it will meet the common law test for determining whether the employer owns the invention, labour relations are not impervious to this problem. It is not uncommon for parties to challenge ownership of a patent, taking into account the final value that a patent may have for a company or inventor. As a result, it is much faster and more cost-effective to establish adequate provisions for the protection of intellectual property during the recruitment process and the process of signing an employment contract. For the best legal document, it should be noted to create the agreement with the following key points: Before concluding an employment contract, it is important to inform potential employees that they may have knowledge or ownership of the intellectual property rights of a former employer or a third party. It is possible and even likely that an employee will not realize the full extent of a previous employer`s obligations or restrictive agreements that are being transferred. To reduce the risk of intellectual property theft, employers should proactively inform potential employees of IP rights that may belong to a previous employer. The onboarding process should require the potential employee to disclose all previous employers and positions, inventions assigned to another company, any ongoing confidentiality obligations to third parties, and non-compete obligations. For all these contractual provisions, it is crucial to determine the penalties that the employee may face if he violates the agreement.
This will have an additional deterrent effect and discourage employees from potentially acting in their own interests. Now let`s look at some of the provisions that need to be included in the employee intellectual property agreement: it is also necessary to ask whether there really is an employee-employer relationship. In many cases, the hiring comes from an independent contractor. Again, this is a multifactor analysis, but it has important implications. Independent contractors generally own what they envision in the absence of written agreements expressly transferring ownership of them to the contractor. For example, under federal copyright laws, ownership of copyrighted works is generally owned by the author (the person who creates them), with the express exception of works made by employees in the course of their employment. This exception does not apply to work performed by independent contractors. Independent contractors own the copyright unless: (1) the work falls under one of the nine types of works established by law and there is a written “business agreement” between the creator of the work and the company that commissioned its creation; or (2) the copyright is assigned in writing by the Contractor. The nine types of works considered commissioned works are narrow: a contribution to a collective work, a part of a film or other audiovisual work, a translation, a complementary work, a compilation, a lehrtest, a test, response material for a test and an atlas. Do not fall into these categories and the copyright belongs to the independent contractor. Intellectual property created during the employment of an employee is not synonymous with the automatic and exclusive ownership of any intellectual property by the employer. In fact, employers who mistakenly believe that they automatically own such goods may pay a high price – monetarily and through the loss of inventions or improvements – for failing to protect that intellectual property or effectively guarantee workers` rights.
Intellectual property rules created by employees can be complicated, but a contract that establishes the attribution of intellectual property to the employer at the beginning of an employment relationship is a solid solution. In the event that, for valid reasons, the employment contract is not signed before the start of the employment relationship, all rights and responsibilities will be assigned from the date of commencement of the employment relationship. .
