お問い合わせ
The bill does not protect temporary agency workers from dismissal at the will of the employer. The courts disagree on whether temporary agency workers should be considered “employees” (under Section 230 of the ERA) and, more importantly, by whom they should be considered “employees”. Confusion in the courts has led to more claims and prevented the enforcement of clear rights. [Citation needed] Temporary agency workers have virtually none of the main rights provided for in the Employment Rights Act 1996, none of which are addressed in the Directive. This means that temporary agency workers may be able to remain without the following rights. [9] You can apply to the Labour Court if your rights have been violated. The courts may also decide to make recommendations to the employment agency and/or the tenant and explain the employee`s rights. In addition, the anti-tax avoidance provisions of the Regulation mean that if it is found that the postings are deliberately structured by the tenant to prevent the temporary agency worker from benefiting from the regulation, a penalty of £5,000 may be imposed on him. These are people who work for you but have a work agency contract – this means they are a temporary worker. However, if your agency offers you a contract of indefinite duration and pays you between orders (sometimes called the Swedish exemption) and you accept this, it means that you are not entitled to equal treatment when it comes to payment. Under the Temporary Agency Workers Regulations, 2010, a temporary worker is a person provided by a temporary employment agency to work temporarily under the supervision and direction of a tenant. The tenant is solely responsible for a violation of the “Day One” claims. In case of violation of a “12 weeks” right, the legal responsibility may lie either with the tenant or with the employment agency.
The agency is responsible for determining the employee`s working conditions, so the responsibility lies initially with the employee. However, given that the regulation provides that tenants provide the employment agency with details of the terms and conditions of employment of their employees, the agency could have a defence if it can be proven that it has taken all reasonable steps to obtain accurate and complete information from the tenant, and it is the tenant`s failure to do so, that caused the violation. In this case, the tenant could be held liable. The regulation stipulates that leave, sick leave of up to 28 weeks, jury service and union actions will suspend the uninterrupted period and will not reset it. Maternity, paternity, pregnancy and adoption leave allow the uninterrupted period to continue as if the temporary worker were still participating in the work. Before the 2005 British general election, the trade unions and the government concluded the so-called Warwick Agreement (according to its signing place, the University of Warwick). This included the government`s promise to reverse its opposition to the EU directive. But in 2007, the government still had to keep its promises, and MP Paul Farrelly introduced the bill on temporary and temporary workers (prevention of less preferred treatments). It reflected the directive in every respect, except that there would be no 6-week waiting period.
In the climate of the time, the bill did not attract enough attention and was discussed out of time. In James v. Greenwich LBC[12] of the Court of Appeal, which further consolidated the subordinate position of temporary agency workers,[13] Mummery LJ declared them “doomed to failure because the government does not support them”. But as soon as that was said, almost exactly the same bill was reintroduced by MP Andrew Miller, with a small change in title to focus on “equal treatment” rather than “preventing less favourable treatment”. Identical in every respect, with the exception of a stricter definition of the employment agency and more provisions for the application of the law, he won the support of almost the entire Labour bank in the House of Commons. From 7 May, he was heard every Wednesday morning in committee. Since the 21st. In May, the government signaled that it would pass something similar to the law, but not to the law itself.
It will provide for a waiting period of 12 weeks until the start of the right to equal pay and exemption, i.e. protection 6 weeks lower than that of the original 2002 directive. [14] But do temporary workers have rights from the first day of work? Yes. These are as follows: You have the same right as other employees and employees to at least 5.6 weeks of paid leave per “vacation year” if you have an assignment. If you are self-employed and accept an assignment through an agency, it may mean that you will be classified as an employee or employee for the duration of the assignment. Even if temporary agency workers had one of the rights provided for in the Employment Rights Act 1996, there would still be no demand for equal pay for temporary agency workers who perform work of equal value to that of a permanent employer. A temporary worker may be treated less favorably in terms of salary and conditions than someone who does the exact same job simply because they go through an agency. .
