Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure Forms

Rule 65 (Failure to disclose or cooperate in disclosure, penalties). This rule deals with procedures whereby a party is obliged to make certain disclosures or to comply fully with the requests for disclosure described in the other rules if the party does not comply with them. The rule sets out procedural requirements, including that the parties will attempt to resolve the dispute over the investigation before making requests for coercion of disclosure or disclosure to the tribunal. The court determines the penalties it may impose if a party continues to violate the disclosure rules and/or continues to fail to comply with the court`s disclosure orders. These possible sanctions include preventing one party from presenting certain evidence, payment of the other party`s attorneys` fees and expenses, and other possible penalties and sanctions. The rule also includes the procedure for obtaining the court`s permission to use witnesses or evidence disclosed prematurely at a hearing or hearing. The rule also responds to the parties` request to keep information stored electronically (e.g. B, on computers, social media accounts, emails, texts, etc.), as well as sanctions if a party destroys or impairs the ability to obtain them. We haven`t identified all the forms available below, but we`ve listed some of the most important forms you`ll need in your case.

Article 85 of the Rules of Procedure (exemption from judgment or order). If a party does not comply with the time limits set out in article 83, it would like to review article 85 to determine whether a judgment can be amended. Although there are different factors between the rules, in practice there is some overlap. Rule 85 (a) of the Rules provides that the Court shall correct any clerical error or omission. Rule 85 (b) is the most frequently cited part of the rule. This allows the Court to modify or set aside its judgment based on certain factors, such as. B excusable error or negligence of one of the parties, newly discovered evidence that was hidden by the other party or that could not have been detected with due diligence, fraud by the other party, the judgment is void, the judgment has been enforced. or other reasons for relief. Most of these applications must be submitted no later than six months after the judgment becomes final. Some exceptions apply. B for example if a judgment is legally ineffective or if a party commits fraud before the court itself – no time limit applies.

Unlike Rule 83, this rule does not extend the time limit for appeal to the Court of Appeal. Rules 66 and 67 (Obligations to review and attempt to resolve through alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”). These rules establish the general expectation that the parties will attempt to resolve the issues without trial or other investigative action. The term alternative dispute resolution is a general term that includes, in part, a number of alternatives that the parties may use to assist in the resolution or other resolution of issues outside the proceedings by the tribunal, including the appointment of a judge to conduct a settlement conference, private mediation, collaborative court proceedings, family law arbitration and a Conciliation Tribunal. Rule 35 (Practice of Family Law). This rule lays down the procedures for the submission of applications in the course of the pending case. Article 91 (Amendment or execution of a decision). This rule lays down the rules of procedure for lodging an application for amendment or enforcement of a decision. In general (depending on the articles), an order to divide assets or debts is never modifiable (i.e.

a party should file an application under Rule 83, Rule 85 or an appeal filed in a timely manner if a party believes that the court has done something wrong). Child support is always subject to change as long as circumstances change significantly and continuously. The same applies to spousal support such as family allowances, unless the parties have previously agreed in the decree that spousal support cannot be changed. The rules regarding mediation requirements have changed. In the past, courts often rejected requests to change legal decision-making and parenting time, unless the parties first went through mediation. The recent amendments to section 91 make it clear that such a requirement cannot be imposed. The court may order the parties to participate in the mediation before a final decision is made, but not as a condition of submitting the amendment. The rule deals with what should be included in a request for amendment and what should be filed with such a request (e.B. B the parties` affidavit on financial information). Rule 9 (Obligations of the parties or of counsel). The parties must keep the court informed of changes in addresses, email addresses and telephone numbers. The rule also imposes certain rules on lawyers who wish to withdraw from representing their clients or when clients change lawyers.

The rule also provides for situations where lawyers can only provide limited representation before the court on certain issues. Rule 76 (Resolution Management Conference). Relatively early in the proceedings, the court will set up resolution management. The objective is to examine whether the parties can reach agreements on some or all of the issues and to establish certain procedures that the parties must follow up to a process on the issues if the problems cannot be resolved by agreement or agreement. Where agreements can be concluded, the Court of Justice examines the agreements and makes them binding. The court may also refer the parties to mediation, settlement conference or other alternative dispute resolution proceedings. The tribunal may set additional or different time limits for investigation and disclosure and, in some cases, schedule a hearing during the Resolution Management Conference. The rules require parties to submit a written statement from the Resolution Management Conference (the rules contain a form that the parties can use for this purpose). The main reason for this rule is to ensure that the case does not stagnate and that the parties are aware of the deadlines and ways to resolve the issues just before the trial. .